Sustainability is not just about the fate of the planet, but also about the well-being of the people on it. And then we should not just regard shareholders and employees, but also think about consumers. This raises an interesting question: can a producer of unhealthy productsbe called a sustainable company? Coca-Cola for example.
One of the most powerful brands in the world is Coca-Cola. The range is huge and its consumption too. But this consumption isalso controversial: 100 ml Coca-Cola contains 42 kilo calories and 10.6 grams of sugar. We live in a world where obesity is a growing problem. In this context, companies like Coca-Cola – where the business model is based on sugar – have come under intense scrutiny. Coca-Cola has responded with making smaller cans, providing better information and producing new, less unhealthy, product varieties (Light, Zero). "We are committed to bring people together to help fight obesity," said Stuart Kronauge, the General Manager for Coke's North America Sparkling Beverages division. But is that enough?
Individual offices of Coca-Cola implement their own quality management systems. Like the Coca-Cola Ýçecek factory in Ankara, the fifth largest plant of Coca-Cola in Turkey. It was built in 1973 as the first large-scale production facility in Turkey. The factory has a good reputation in the field of quality management: it is continuously strives to improve. Over the yearsmany quality tools have been implemented, such as Lean 6 Sigma, Maintenance Excellence and Kobetsu Kaizen. The factory, equipped with a number of ISO certificates, has received several prizes ánd won the Turkish National Quality Award. The implementation of the EFQM Excellence Model in the plant attributed to winning this National Quality Award.
In 2012, the trophy cabinet of the Coca-Cola plant in Ankara filled up further with winning the EFQM price for Taking Responsibility for a Sustainable Future. However the fact that a plant of Coca-Cola would receive this particular price of EFQM I find odd. The expectation of this fundamental concept is that an organization has a positive impact on the world around them, in economic, environmental and social terms. But facilitating obesity does not fit this description for me.
More strength, more balance, more relaxationPosted June 24, 2015 in Step 3: self assessment
Quick Guide to more energy and better healthPosted May 20, 2015 in Step 3: self assessment
A classy alternative to food wastagePosted February 11, 2015 in Step 3: self assessment
EFQM Forum 2014Posted October 29, 2014 in Step 3: self assessment
How marketing spoils our tastePosted September 24, 2014 in Step 3: self assessment